October 26, 2002
What do people say of Bali? Then?
These list are new coverage continuing Bali's bomb which blast on Oct 12. Most of, I didn't nothing why, did stupid news coverage. I was angry you know, I was very confused why the such hell analysis and politically act just seemly want to 'war'Indonesia, including their stupid very dumb Indonesian newspaper.
- Police to Reconstruct Bali Bombing - Oct 25, Guardian UK
- Bali fallout: Picking up the pieces - Oct 25, Asia Times
- Attack brings Bali and Jakarta further apart - Oct 25, Financial Times
- 22% of Bali tourist jobs set to go - Oct 25, Ananova
- UK royals lead Bali memorial - Oct 25, CNN
- Terrorism and Revolution - Oct 24, Radio Singapore
Okay, I'll try to stay calm. But, as you'll look after to read more news, you'll get such these things on your mind (or not?), "Indonesia is dangerous country which many terrorists were stand alive healthy, and happily ever after," just very like most classic stories we've read. Then, to fight on terror, 'they' will need to stand together like their own beloved countries, I really don't exactly know who they are, but you must be know they are "Bushess" and "Blairest". If you've watched The Sum All of Fear, it's likely what the Russian president (who is he?) said to US' security advisors, "We know that my wife made an affair behind us, that doesn't mean that you need to taken care of our problem" or in other mean, "This is my house, why I need another guard's house to protect my territory?" But, we exactly will know what answer will countinue on, it must be, if you don't, your country must be a terrorist land. Yeah, a blunder of very fool we have.
Okay look at this stupid comment I quote from Radio Singapore Internation website:
We all know what happened in Bali, at Kuta Beach. Or do we? I hear the confusion every day, as people say "that destroys Bali's economy, it will hurt the whole country, it will hurt the whole region. Why would they do that?" Because "they" want the whole region to suffer so much the established order will collapse in despair, after which angry and frightened people will turn to extreme solutions. It is called revolution. That is the agenda, terror is just the means. These groups of fanatical killers, Al Qaeda, Jemaah Islamiah, Kumpulan Militant Malaysia, all have the same ultimate target: their own society. Here in Southeast Asia the goal is to establish a so-called Islamic caliphate, a theocractic state encompassing Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Brunei, and Singapore.
I want you focuses on those bolded text, yes, there're too many ifs, if they want to make revolution, why they destroy all country's future? Why? Why very stupid why? If, yes if again, they want to change the government, like other's rebels did, they easily just kill the president or the prime ministers, it's very easy than bombing Bali, which means disrupt all the country's future. It's likely means, all coverage in any mass media just do another thing, which just to create a bad image for generally Islam on basic purposes, to establish a so-called Islamic caliphate. Caliphate is not really different than monarchy, which United Kingdom still use until now. We know this model of government doesn't ideal in this era, and this is very dumb thinking. I still don't know another reason, do you?
Long before this event, even after the first bom I heard blew out in Indonesia happened long before Sept 11, i believed that there must be a (and may some) terrorist network in Indonesia. Why we so confused with this buzzyword? The point is, why there so many terrorist now, and I still believe, in the next future of our civilization the terorism is a product of any movement in globalised world. Terorism is an antidote of free-information era that we happily celebrate right now. If we could freely, and anonymously get information in this way, why we couldn't do crime in anonymous ways? Of course, it isn't be only in Islam, but every faiths and beliefs and ourgrowth thinking could turn to this? In any aspect and purposes. The Washiton sniper attack who had killed more than eight people in public places are the main example of this postulat. And may be more in future.
I realised that me (may be, just in my opinion), is not a likely militant or fundamentalist one, anything if you want to call. Look all my former post here, and you'll sure that, "Oh yeah, Arif is open thinking guys, he will never thought like that." But, the reality, i come to think like this, like the way every militant did. Like this Jakarta based newspaper comment, why some liberal muslims cleric become to anti-American? And still rise? Show me that we really dumb, and why?
Posted at October 26, 2002 03:31 AM | Indonesia
